Interactive Industry - News & Views

MarketNet provides analysis and opinions on Application Development, Ecommerce, Marketing, SEO, Social Networking, Web 2.0, creative trends, best practices, and much more.

Resources: Fab Friday Flair

It’s been a fantastic week, and it’s time to wrap up the day and get our weekend groove on. So as we stick a fork in the week, check out these freakishly fabulous Friday faves:

Mashable – Twitter Launches Verified Accounts

Adage – Want to Tweet? Do It From an Ad Unit Nearby

Technology Review – Social Networks Keep Privacy in the Closet

WebProNews – What’s Robert Scoble Building in Building43?

Lifehacker – The Google Wave Highlight Reel

Mashable – Wofram Alpha Comes to iPhone

That’ll do it for today. Stop fighting that Friday fever and file out to have fun with friends or family.

Popularity: 12% [?]

  • http://leapfrog.com georgia

    Need to better understand examples of “rewards” vs. “prizes” which can taint the authenticity of a review.

    thanks!

  • http://www.marketnet.com/ Daniel Dessinger

    @georgia I’ll probably respond in two parts, the second to follow tomorrow. I don’t see rewards or prizes tainting the authenticity of a review as much as cold hard cash. I think the exchange of dollars is understood as contractual employment. If you paid someone to review a product, they’re less likely to be seen as impartial. If you offer prizes for participating in a review, public perception is more likely to see it as simple motivation to get reviewers involved.

    And though I lumped in “rewards”, I think we’ve all be trained to see rewards more as membership privileges. If you’re a member, rewards are probably discounts for one thing or another. They’re either earned by repetitive good behavior or they’re just perks for being a member. A prize is more often associated with an actual gift: a product, a free service, a vacation, etc.

    Ultimately, the authenticity of reviews shouldn’t be tainted if the company states in clear language that incentives will be awarded regardless of the quality, opinion, or content of each review.

  • http://www.marketnet.com/ Daniel Dessinger

    @georgia I’ll probably respond in two parts, the second to follow tomorrow. I don’t see rewards or prizes tainting the authenticity of a review as much as cold hard cash. I think the exchange of dollars is understood as contractual employment. If you paid someone to review a product, they’re less likely to be seen as impartial. If you offer prizes for participating in a review, public perception is more likely to see it as simple motivation to get reviewers involved.

    And though I lumped in “rewards”, I think we’ve all be trained to see rewards more as membership privileges. If you’re a member, rewards are probably discounts for one thing or another. They’re either earned by repetitive good behavior or they’re just perks for being a member. A prize is more often associated with an actual gift: a product, a free service, a vacation, etc.

    Ultimately, the authenticity of reviews shouldn’t be tainted if the company states in clear language that incentives will be awarded regardless of the quality, opinion, or content of each review.

  • http://www.marketnet.com/ Daniel Dessinger

    @georgia, There is one caveat I’d like to add about yesterday’s response. Knowing at least a few blog communities rather well, I can attest to the fact that bloggers who review a product or service and do not acknowledge they were compensated have caused quite a stir at times. This is typically true of the most influential bloggers.

    Guy Kawasaki test drove a few high-end automobiles this year and offered raving reviews, causing the public to question whether he was compensated for his endorsements. I saw accusations flying that he was given cars as payment for his reviews, but from what I remember, he denied the accusations.

    I know some well respected bloggers in the social media marketing sphere always note whether a review is paid or not. They feel compelled to do so because their reputations are on the line and it’s always easier to keep a reputation good than to repair it.

    The need for transparency increases exponentially with popularity and influence in the blogosphere. It’s a well-known and used tactic to blast popular bloggers with accusations, insults, or vehement disagreements in order to build some popularity for one’s own blog. That being the case, there is a need for transparency so one doesn’t become the unnecessary target of an ambitious newbie.

  • http://www.marketnet.com/ Daniel Dessinger

    @georgia, There is one caveat I’d like to add about yesterday’s response. Knowing at least a few blog communities rather well, I can attest to the fact that bloggers who review a product or service and do not acknowledge they were compensated have caused quite a stir at times. This is typically true of the most influential bloggers.

    Guy Kawasaki test drove a few high-end automobiles this year and offered raving reviews, causing the public to question whether he was compensated for his endorsements. I saw accusations flying that he was given cars as payment for his reviews, but from what I remember, he denied the accusations.

    I know some well respected bloggers in the social media marketing sphere always note whether a review is paid or not. They feel compelled to do so because their reputations are on the line and it’s always easier to keep a reputation good than to repair it.

    The need for transparency increases exponentially with popularity and influence in the blogosphere. It’s a well-known and used tactic to blast popular bloggers with accusations, insults, or vehement disagreements in order to build some popularity for one’s own blog. That being the case, there is a need for transparency so one doesn’t become the unnecessary target of an ambitious newbie.

  • http://leapfrog.com/ georgia

    Need to better understand examples of “rewards” vs. “prizes” which can taint the authenticity of a review.

    thanks!

blog comments powered by Disqus
2008 MarketNet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.   Privacy Policy 972.941.3200 800.371.1176